Friday, August 31, 2007

Early Christianity: A Study -Diversity & Heresy

Duration: 20:45 minutes
Upload Time: 07-04-15 19:53:22
User: wayman29
:::: Favorites
Description:

Sorry to be long winded. Have a drink and enjoy. Early Christian Writings http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/alphabetical.html The Quest of the Historical Jesus http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/schweitzer/ Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~humm/Resources/Bauer/bauer05.htm Q: The Lost Sayings Source Burton Mack's translation http://www.cygnus-study.com/pageq.html

Comments
deeannecutemomsn ::: Favorites
Find a fun fling today at DAYFLING dot COM
07-08-13 17:33:11
_____________________________________________________
TheMightyCitizen ::: Favorites
I just wanna say I'm really enjoying this series, I especially like how you give us source material, so that we could follow along with you. Thanks.
07-04-24 07:15:16
_____________________________________________________
wayman29 ::: Favorites
Thanks for commenting. I am finding that many people have great information here. If you have any books or writers you like on the topic feel free to PM me!
07-04-19 01:27:23
_____________________________________________________
Irenaeus1 ::: Favorites
The idea of an orthodoxy is an anachronism until 325 AD. The proto-orthodox view ultimately resulting in the Nicene Creed came to power as much due to its system of apostolic succession securing compliance and "orthodoxy" as the strength of its beliefs. For a false view of the diverse beliefs, Acts and Eusebius' Ecclesiatical History whitewash the controversy and marginalize of contrary thoughts. This whitewash continues to be effective 1700 years later. GREAT JOB, Wayman29
07-04-18 22:30:17
_____________________________________________________
g0at ::: Favorites
Yeah I would like to hear more about ebonites and gnostics :)
07-04-17 09:11:06
_____________________________________________________
wayman29 ::: Favorites
Thanks, I am trying to work through this rather slowly because there are so many angles. I have not even heard of some of the angles you discuss so I will be looking in to that side of things. If you have a pile of book references or links feel free to PM me. I am still looking over what you sent in before. Your comments are most helpful!
07-04-17 08:28:08
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
smadewell ::: Favorites
I applaud your efforts in getting back to early Christianity, which is something few Christians want to spend time doing, but I would encourage you to set aside any Christian and/or Gnostic bias and examine the culture of the main players in Yeshua's Kingdom/Repentance Movement and their Jewish POV and the origins of the religio-ideological "cold war" between the plebeian (Galilean) School of Hillel and the patrician (Judean) School of Shammai -- as well as the origins of proto-Gnosticism.
07-04-17 00:27:27
_____________________________________________________
islamme1 ::: Favorites
good video brother wayman29 may God bless you
07-04-16 14:00:45
_____________________________________________________
wayman29 ::: Favorites
Hey nice views here! Thanks for the comments I'll have to take a look at some of these ideas.
07-04-16 11:30:42
_____________________________________________________
smadewell ::: Favorites
Schmithals makes a case that the Galatian opponents weren't "Judaizers" but rather proto-Gnostics. Paul own corrective epistles were used & twisted by these & other proto-Gnostics; hence, his bad rep with the Ebionites. Paul wasn't antinomian. Paul didn't have a falling out with Peter or James. Peter was at Antioch prior to Acts 15 & the circumcision issue was brought up by spies from the Pharisaic School of Shammai. The ruling in Acts 15 went according to the Pharisaic School of Hillel.
07-04-16 08:12:21
_____________________________________________________

No comments: