Intel Penryn buries AMD K10 Under PovRay 3.7

	Duration: 08:40 minutes Upload Time: 07-06-05 21:25:42 User: PierreElliottTrudeau :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: Use the Graph Provided here: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v51/ElMoIsEviL/march-comp-sm.png The Intel PovRay 3.7 SSE2 benchmark was a response to this claim: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGiv9Dtrc5Q
Comments
TRIXOWNSONCSS ::: Favorites good shit, thanks 07-09-09 12:02:48 __________________________________________________
xelink ::: Favorites as you said, this is only one instance. an instance which i don't give a care about. I honestly think the K10 will dominate penryn. and I'm hoping so as well, because the way it looks right now, penryn isn't worth upgrading to(over my current c2d) and I don't want to dish out for 4GB DDR3 RAM(to replace the 4GB DDR2 RAM I have)to go nehalem. 07-08-23 16:04:42 __________________________________________________
savagesteve13 ::: Favorites You people need to get a life. Tradionally you get chicks by having the fastest car, not by bragging that you have an awesome CPU. 07-08-22 17:30:10 __________________________________________________
golem72002 ::: Favorites so desktop version phenom will need SSE4 & more instruction per clock, if they can do it. 07-08-21 18:55:26 __________________________________________________
AK7ZINN2B ::: Favorites Very refressing video . Zero spin(lies) . Or correct Amd has been putting out nothing but spin. As for another posters remarks about K10 running @ 3.ghz. What were the benchmark scores? Were does K10 from AMD 3.0ghz show up in AMD's road maps. If intel wanted to they could show Penryn 4 cores running @ 4.0+ GHz . But Intels choice is to not spin . But to show real world results NOT fantasty world results. 07-08-21 10:19:49 __________________________________________________
zytekfan ::: Favorites Yorkfield is still a 2 die chip. Easier way to keep yields up. 07-08-19 00:44:36 __________________________________________________
warmoviesboy ::: Favorites hey guys amd showed a 3.0ghz and phenom x4 running at 1.38v and the 1.6ghz at 1.08v this info came like 2 day ago on fudzilla look for your self type mad in the search box there 07-08-05 18:38:25 __________________________________________________
painboy2005 ::: Favorites A pretty good summary between the two upcoming architectures. a minor error about AMD's benchies being 2.0Ghz, they were actually 1.6Ghz, though these were simulated and still wouldn't have surpassed Intel's V8 results even if they were at identical clock speeds. 07-07-24 17:02:30 __________________________________________________
arthur2647 ::: Favorites end of this year intel is bringing out yorksfield is their true quad core with a 12mb L2 cache and its not two core 2 duos together its single chips. 07-07-19 12:24:13 __________________________________________________
sobchuk ::: Favorites It's true what you said. Good response. One benchmark can't show a systems's true performance. When they are both side by side running the same applications that users will use, then make your judgements what is best for you, not best for someone else. But I guess there are those wanting to play god and make everyones minds up for themselves. 07-07-17 03:59:12 __________________________________________________